mirrors/org-mode
0
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/emacs/org-mode.git synced 2024-09-12 11:40:05 +00:00
Code Releases Activity

added TODO for result name lines #+resname:

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Eric Schulte 2009-05-20 18:38:24 -07:00
parent 801345d41d
commit b21e61be60
1 changed files with 11 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
rorg.org
View file

@ -4,17 +4,23 @@
#+STARTUP: oddeven #+STARTUP: oddeven
* Tasks [12/18] * Tasks [12/18]
** TODO results-type header (scalar/vector) ** TODO results-type header (scalar/vector) [0/1]
In response to a point in Dan's email. We should allow the user to In response to a point in Dan's email. We should allow the user to
force scalar or vector results. This could be done with a header force scalar or vector results. This could be done with a header
argument, and the default behavior could be controlled through a argument, and the default behavior could be controlled through a
configuration variable. configuration variable.
*** TODO results name
In order to do this we will need to start naming our results.
Since the source blocks are named with =#+srcname:= lines we can Since the source blocks are named with =#+srcname:= lines we can
name results with =#+resname:= lines (if the source block has no name results with =#+resname:= lines (if the source block has no
name then no name is given to the =#+resname:= line on creation, name then no name is given to the =#+resname:= line on creation,
otherwise the name of the source block is used). otherwise the name of the source block is used).
This will have the additional benefit of allowing results and
source blocks to be located in different places in a buffer (and
eventually in different buffers entirely).
** TODO re-implement R evaluation using ess-command or ess-execute ** TODO re-implement R evaluation using ess-command or ess-execute
I don't have any complaints with the current R evaluation code or I don't have any complaints with the current R evaluation code or
behaviour, but I think it would be good to use the ESS functions behaviour, but I think it would be good to use the ESS functions