Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> As I was saying in anoter post, it looks like there's something
> weird happening when using C-k in agenda view:
>
> 1. Create two new remember entries (i.e. test and test2) with the
> same tag (I used @office)
> 2. Narrow down the agenda view to only see the @office entries.
> 3. Kill the last but one entry (it should be "test") : both of
> "test" and "test2" disappear frow the view. Actually, "test2" is
> not properly killed, but it is scary nonetheless.
>
> It only happens with two last entries.
>
> Is anyone able to reproduce this ?
All export commands now push the result to the kill ring by default.
This is subject to the variable `org-export-push-to-kill-ring'.
Also, this commit adds a new variable
`org-export-show-temporary-export-buffer' which can be used to turn
off the display of the temporary buffer containing the exported text.
Since this stuff is now automatically pushed onto the kill ring, some
people might prefer not to see this buffer.
Mikael Fornius writes:
> This is my suggestion of an implementation of min/mean/max computation
> in columnview summaries. If you like it feel free to use it.
>
> New operators: {min}, {max} and {mean} possibly prefixed with : for use
> with timevalues.
>
> Example from my running exercise diary:
>
> #+COLUMNS: %DISTANCE{+;%.1f} %HEARTRATE{mean;%.1f} %SPEED{:min} %CALORIES{+}
>
> Gives a colview with summaries:
>
> total distance, mean heartrate, fastest speed (min/km) and total
> calories.
>
> I have tested it on emacs-23 and it works well for me now, also with the
> interactive colview functions.
>
> But you never know really. ;-) Anyway, there should not be any emacs-23
> specific elisp code added afik.
>
> (Because I do not use xemacs I have not tested it with xemacs but the
> small changes I made should be compitable to both xemacs and emacs. I
> would appreciate if someone on this list who uses xemacs will give it a
> try for me. Thanks!)
>
> (This fix also opens up for using user defined lisp functions to
> calculate colview summaries, but I am not sure if that is something
> useful. Like this:
>
> (defun std (&rest values)
> "Compute standard deviation."
> ...)
>
> #+COLUMNS: %DATA{eval:std}
>
> If someone finds this attractive it would now be easy to implement as well.)
>
