* lisp/org-macs.el (org-called-interactively-p): New macro.
* lisp/org-freemind.el: No longer require 'rx.
(org-freemind): New customization group, use it for all the variables.
(org-export-as-freemind): Add docstring.
(org-freemind-show): Improve filen naming.
(org-freemind-convert-links-helper): New function.
(org-freemind-bol-helper-base-indent): New variable.
(org-freemind-bol-helper): New function.
(org-freemind-node-css-style): New option.
(org-freemind-node-pattern): New variable.
(org-freemind-from-org-mode): Better docstring.
Thanks to Nick Dokos for pointing out this as a fix to a Babel issue
* lisp/org-macs.el (org-save-outline-visibility): moved from org.el
* lisp/org.el: moved `org-save-outline-visibility' to org-macs.el
* lisp/org-macs.el (org-string-nw-p): New function.
* lisp/org-capture.el (org-capture-import-remember-templates): Interpret
an empty string as request to use `org-default-notes-file'.
(org-capture-target-buffer): If the FILE is not a (non-empty) string,
use `org-default-notes-file'.
* lisp/org-macs.el (org-not-nil): Return the value if not interpreted
as nil.
* lisp/org.el (org-entry-get):
(org-entry-get-with-inheritance): Interpret the value "nil"
as nil for properties.
Bernt Hansen writes:
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Jun 25, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> >
> > > Question: what is the proper way to get a NIL into a property? Are
> > > we
> > > to use () instead of "nil"? Or are property values always interpreted
> > > as strings?
> > >
> > > Apologies in advance if this is a stupid question!
> >
> > Not a stupid question at all.
> >
> > There is no way, currently. Property values are string - the only
> > way to make
> > org-entry-get return nil is to not have the property defined at all.
>
> I've wanted a similar thing in the past for the LOGGING property where
> the parent task has special logging set via the LOGGING property but I
> want to undo that for some of the child tasks so they use the default
> logging setup.
>
> Having a way to undefine a property would be good in general I think.
-Bernt
* lisp/org-macs.el (org-not-nil): New function.
* lisp/org.el (org-block-todo-from-children-or-siblings-or-parent):
Use `org-not-nil' to interpret a property value of nil.
Robert Goldman writes:
> I have found what I believe to be a bug in handling ordered subtasks.
> Here is the behavior:
>
> I have a top level set of tasks that is ordered.
>
> One of the outline items below the top level set is a grab bag of tasks
> that will be performed in parallel. So this task is NOT ordered
> (ORDERED: nil).
>
> The problem is that the blocking behavior from ordered tasks seems to be
> inherited from the top level task list into the second level of the
> outline, even though the ORDERED property at the second level is
> explicitly overridden.
>
> I am attaching an org file that displays this issue. To see the
> problem, put your cursor on the "Bar" task and attempt to change its
> status to DONE.
The problem was here that the value of the property is the string
"nil", which is of course not nil.
This patches introduces a special case to interpret "nil" as nil.
* lisp/org-macs.el (org-rm-props): Add org-emphasis to the properties
that must be removed.
* lisp/org.el (org-do-emphasis-faces): Add org-emphasis property to
items that have emphasis done wit font-lock.
(org-fontify-entities): Do not do anything in commented lines.
(org-unfontify-region): Decompose the region as well, because we do
composition during font-lock.
(org-raise-scripts): Do nothing inside an emphasis string.
Reported by Eric Fraga in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/25940
David Maus
Achim Gratz
Bastien Guerry
Carsten Dominik
Eric Schulte
Philip Rooke
Bernt Hansen