tec/org-mode
tec/org-mode
1
0
Fork 0
forked from mirrors/org-mode
Code Pull requests Releases Activity

new tasks: selective export of code/text, code block folding, interactive session output -> litorgy conversion

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Dan Davison 2009-04-13 14:37:30 -04:00
parent 458e10155b
commit 4ba43552c0
1 changed files with 28 additions and 11 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

39
rorg.org
View file

@ -3,15 +3,32 @@
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO OPEN | DONE RESOLVED
#+STARTUP: oddeven
* Tasks [4/6]
** TODO evaluation of shell code as background process? [DED]
After C-c C-c on an R code block, the process may appear to block,
but C-g can be used to reclaim control of the .org buffer, without
interrupting the R evalution. However I believe this is not true of
bash/sh evaluation. [Haven't tried other languages] Perhaps a
solution is just to background the individual shell
commands.
* Tasks [4/9]
** TODO selective export of text, code, figures
[DED] The litorgy buffer contains everything (code, headings and
notes/prose describing what you're up to, textual/numeric/graphical
code output, etc). However on export to html / LaTeX one might want
to include only a subset of that content. For example you might
want to create a presentation of what you've done which omits the
code.
** TODO folding of code blocks?
[DED] In similar way to using outline-minor-mode for folding function
bodies, can we fold code blocks? #+begin whatever statements are
pretty ugly, and in any case when you're thinking about the overall
game plan you don't necessarily want to see the code for each step.
** TODO conversion of output from interactive shell, R (and python) sessions to litorgy buffers
[DED] This would be a nice feature I think. Although a litorgy purist
would say that it's working the wrong way round... After some
interactive work in a *R* buffer, you save the buffer, maybe edit
out some lines, and then convert it to litorgy format for
posterity. Same for a shell session either in a *shell* buffer, or
pasted from another terminal emulator. And python of course.
** TODO evaluation of shell code as background process?
After C-c C-c on an R code block, the process may appear to
block, but C-g can be used to reclaim control of the .org buffer,
without interrupting the R evalution. However I believe this is not
true of bash/sh evaluation. [Haven't tried other languages] Perhaps
a solution is just to background the individual shell commands.
The other languages (aside from emacs lisp) are run through the
shell, so if we find a shell solution it should work for them as
@ -35,8 +52,8 @@
process marker in the org buffer.
*** 'working' spinner
It may be nice and not too difficult to place a spinner on/near the
evaluating source code block
It may be nice and not too difficult to place a spinner on/near the
evaluating source code block
** TODO ability to select which of multiple R sessions is being used
(like ess-switch-process in .R buffers)