adding ** TODO add =:none= session argument (for purely functional execution)

This commit is contained in:
Eric Schulte 2009-06-14 10:32:10 -07:00
parent 7d063efd28
commit 5e41083bfa

View file

@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ table, allowing the test suite to be run be evaluation of the table
and the results to be collected in the same table. and the results to be collected in the same table.
* Tasks [22/41] * Tasks [22/42]
** TODO add a function to jump to a source-block by name ** TODO add a function to jump to a source-block by name
I've had an initial stab at that in org-babel-find-named-block I've had an initial stab at that in org-babel-find-named-block
(library-of-babel branch). (library-of-babel branch).
@ -670,6 +670,9 @@ This should be callable from inside of a source-code block in an
org-mode buffer. It should evaluate the header arguments, then bring org-mode buffer. It should evaluate the header arguments, then bring
up the inf-proc buffer using =pop-to-buffer=. up the inf-proc buffer using =pop-to-buffer=.
For lack of a better place, lets add this to the
`org-shiftmetadown-hook' hook.
*** TODO function to dump last N lines from inf-proc buffer into the current source block *** TODO function to dump last N lines from inf-proc buffer into the current source block
Callable with a prefix argument to specify how many lines should be Callable with a prefix argument to specify how many lines should be
@ -706,6 +709,11 @@ executions.
5 5
#+end_src #+end_src
** TODO add =:none= session argument (for purely functional execution)
This would allow source blocks to be run in their own new process
These blocks could then also be run in the background.
** TODO support for working with =*Org Edit Src Example*= buffers [1/4] ** TODO support for working with =*Org Edit Src Example*= buffers [1/4]
*** TODO set buffer-local-process variables appropriately [DED] *** TODO set buffer-local-process variables appropriately [DED]
I think something like this would be great. You've probably I think something like this would be great. You've probably