to enforce a structure on the document that we can use moving forward,
so that any future objective changes are all made to the main
objective list.
I apologize for removing sections written by other people. I did this
when they were redundant or it was not clear how to fit them into this
structure. Rest assured if the previous text wasn't persisted in git
I would have been much more cautious about removing it.
I hope that this outline structure should be able to remain stable
through the process of fleshing out objectives, and cashing those
objectives out into tasks. That said, please feel free to make any
changes that you see fit.
Changes include...
- tearing stuff out, and imposing structure
- updated .gitignore to ignore exported files
Now any line like
#+XYZ_TODO:
will be assumed to define some kind of TODO chain. If the handlers in
`org-todo-setup-filter-hook' do not do anything with this sequence, it
will be treated as `sequence'.
progressing so far. It's nice to work on a project where everyone
uses org-mode.
additions:
- proposal for how we should implement the R-source-code blocks
- example of source code evaluation using org-eval-light.el
- notes section on evaluation of R code
- some scattered thoughts/suggestions
William Henney writes:
Consider a structure like this:
* first
** second
*** third
**** fourth
Currently, if I export the "third" sub-tree to html (via "C-c @
C-x C-e h"), then "third" becomes an <h1> heading, but "fourth"
becomes an <h5> heading. I would rather it were <h2>, i.e. that
all heading levels be relative to the root of the sub-tree. Is
there any way to achieve this?
This was not possible so far, but this commit measures the first
headline of the subtree and applies an offset to all level values.
Hsui-Khuern Tang writes:
I have a table where one column consists of inactive dates, such as
this:
| Date | OK? |
|------------------+-----|
| [2009-01-30 Fri] | x |
| [2009-01-27 Tue] | x |
| [2009-01-28 Wed] | x |
I can't sort the table by that column. If I change the dates to
active, then sorting (by time) works fine. Is this behavior
intentional?
Yes, intentional, because the same routine also does sorting of
entries and should prefer active time stamps. However, I realize that
we can still look for an inactive time stamp when no active one can be
found. This is what this commit implements.
the results are in existing_tools/exp-blocks/example-for-r.html. To
get this working I had to make two changes...
First in testing.Rorg, I changed every block as follows
from
#+BEGIN_R:
#+END_R
to
#+BEGIN_R
#+END_R
Second I fixed a broken regexp in org-exp-blocks.el
This is capable of running calculations on the R blocks and the inline
\R{} segments, but is not yet able to handle the image generation
commands.
